MGMLaboratory
Back

Menu

01Home
02About Us
03Projects
04Publications
05Member
06Articles
07Contact

Let's Talk

Open in Mail app

Socials

Malang (ID) --:--Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

January 1, 20212 min read

A Smartwatch Interface Cut Transit Travel Time by Six MinutesA Smartwatch Interface Cut Transit Travel Time by Six Minutes

A twenty person study in Malang moved the journey guidance from phone screen to wrist, and the numbers moved with it.

  • Journal
  • Publications

Written by

  • SRShirasaka RenIT & Infrastructure · Student Member

In this article

  1. 01What changed with the watch

Using a transit app inside a crowded bus or angkot is harder than it looks. Passengers have to hold a bag, watch for their stop and stare at a phone screen at once. For visitors who do not know the city, that is stressful.

A bus stop where guidance often gets checked. Image: CEphoto, Uwe Aranas, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 01A bus stop where guidance often gets checked. Image: CEphoto, Uwe Aranas, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

A team from Universitas Brawijaya studied the problem on the public transit routes of Malang. They recorded how twenty participants actually travelled, then built a prototype that moves guidance onto a smartwatch. The watch shows the itinerary, tracks the route in the background and vibrates near a checkpoint.

01/01

What changed with the watch

The same twenty people then ran the trip twice, once with a standard map based phone app and once with the watch prototype. The team recorded trip duration, task completion and user ratings.

  • Average travel time fell from 26.20 minutes on the phone to 20.40 minutes with the watch.
  • Both setups reached the destination every time, with a 100 percent success rate.
  • System Usability Scale scores came out close: 72.13 for the phone against 72.50 for the watch.
Guidance on the wrist instead of in the hand. Image: TheArchivistMan, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 02Guidance on the wrist instead of in the hand. Image: TheArchivistMan, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The six minute gap is the headline, but the per question results explain it. On not needing to keep monitoring the app, the phone scored 0.70 and the watch 2.65. That is the crowded bus problem in one number: riders stopped holding a screen in front of their face.

Several riders said the hands free interaction reduced their anxiety, and the simpler interface was quicker to learn. Since overall usability scores stayed almost identical, the gain did not come from the app feeling better. It came from where the information sat.

Source

  1. Brata et al. (2021). Usability improvement of public transit application through mental model and user journey. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication, Computing, Electronics and Control.

    DOI10.12928/telkomnika.v19i2.18323 (opens in a new tab)

Next articleA web tool that drafts the concept map for the teacher(Keep scrolling)(Read it next)(Loading)

The obvious caveat is hardware. Using the design means buying a smartwatch, which not everyone can afford, and the study covers twenty people in one city. The authors present it as preliminary. Even so, it makes a useful point for builders of transit software: the interface is not only what you show, but the device the rider holds while the bus moves.