MGMLaboratory
Back

Menu

01Home
02About Us
03Projects
04Publications
05Member
06Articles
07Contact

Let's Talk

Open in Mail app

Socials

Malang (ID) --:--Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

January 1, 20232 min read

Rebuilding a Mind Map to Learn It BetterRebuilding a Mind Map to Learn It Better

A classroom experiment compared rebuilding a whole mind map with rebuilding only its leaves.

  • Conference
  • Publications

Written by

  • SRShirasaka RenIT & Infrastructure · Student Member

In this article

  1. 01Two ways to rebuild
  2. 02What the tests showed

A mind map is a thinking tool. It lays out understanding as branches, with a central idea at the root and related concepts spreading outward. People draw them to organise their own thinking, and they share them so others can follow along. The catch is that reading a map someone else built is not the same as understanding it.

A mind map lays out understanding as branches. Image: Tanjatod, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 01A mind map lays out understanding as branches. Image: Tanjatod, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The researchers borrowed a technique that already worked for concept maps: the recomposition method. A map is taken apart into its pieces, and the learner has to put it back together. Doing that requires actually knowing how the pieces relate. Applied to a mind map, the full version means decomposing the entire map and rebuilding all of it.

01/02

Two ways to rebuild

The authors proposed a lighter option. In the Leaves Recomposition method, students rebuild only the leaves, the endpoints at the edge of the map. Their reasoning is neat: to place a leaf correctly, you still need to understand the whole path that runs from the root to that leaf. So the thinking stays, but the typing shrinks.

Concept maps follow the same rebuild principle. Image: Dvitalo12, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 02Concept maps follow the same rebuild principle. Image: Dvitalo12, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

02/02

What the tests showed

The team ran comparative experiments between the two methods and measured students before and after. Both groups improved significantly. Just as importantly, the difference between the full method and the leaves method was not statistically significant, so the lighter version gave up nothing on the test scores.

The map scores told a second story. Growth rates were much higher for the leaves method than for the full one, and the questionnaire responses described the leaves version as the easier exercise. Students spent less effort and still built maps that moved closer to the target structure.

Two conclusions follow. Rebuilding a mind map has a measurable learning effect, and that effect survives when the exercise is made lighter. The authors frame this as reducing cognitive load while keeping the learning, which is a rare and useful combination in classroom tool design.

Source

  1. Kodai Watanabe et al. (2023). Application of the Recomposition Method to Mind Map and Experimental Verification of Learning Effect. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

    DOI10.1007/978-3-031-35129-7_28 (opens in a new tab)

Next articleLess Work, Same Learning: Rebuilding Only the Leaves(Keep scrolling)(Read it next)(Loading)