MGMLaboratory
Back

Menu

01Home
02About Us
03Projects
04Publications
05Member
06Articles
07Contact

Let's Talk

Open in Mail app

Socials

Malang (ID) --:--Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

July 23, 20232 min read

Map Quality and Higher Order Thinking in Kit Build ClassroomsMap Quality and Higher Order Thinking in Kit Build Classrooms

When students draw better concept maps, their answers to harder questions get better too.

  • Conference
  • Publications

Written by

  • SRShirasaka RenIT & Infrastructure · Student Member

In this article

  1. 01What the study tested
  2. 02What came out of it

Higher order thinking asks students to analyze, evaluate, and create rather than recall. It is also hard to see. Marking a right answer is quick, but judging whether a student has genuinely restructured their understanding takes time few classes have.

A mind map laying out how ideas connect. Image: Mirko Lesko, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 01A mind map laying out how ideas connect. Image: Mirko Lesko, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Concept maps offer a way in. A map shows which ideas a learner treats as related, and that structure is visible to a teacher and to a machine. Kit Build takes advantage: students rebuild a map from a fixed kit, so the result can be compared against an expert version automatically.

01/02

What the study tested

Earlier work showed that raising map quality through Kit Build improves achievement, but nobody had checked whether it also stirs higher order thinking. The authors tested that link, and asked a second question: does automatic scoring agree with human judges?

  • Higher order thinking was measured through performance on higher order questions.
  • Map quality was scored automatically, then checked against manual assessment.
A map built from linked nodes and phrases. Image: Zulayho Matjanova, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 02A map built from linked nodes and phrases. Image: Zulayho Matjanova, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

02/02

What came out of it

Improving map quality went together with stronger higher order thinking. Students who produced better structured maps handled the demanding questions better, which supports the idea that map quality is not just a neatness score. It shows how well the material is organized in the learner's head.

The automatic assessment held up too. Its results lined up closely with manual grading, and the authors call it a promising way to judge map quality. That matters, because manual scoring is the step that usually stops teachers from using concept maps.

A class working through new material. Image: RainaKate, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Fig. 03A class working through new material. Image: RainaKate, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The practical value is a shorter feedback loop. If software can score a map the moment a student finishes it, teachers keep the hours manual marking would take, and students get a signal while the topic is fresh. The study stops short of promising a replacement for human judgement, but the automatic version looks close enough to help.

For schools weighing mapping activities, the finding is encouraging. The same task that produces a gradeable artefact also pushes students toward the thinking skills that are hardest to teach directly.

Source

  1. Nurmaya et al. (2023). Investigation of the Relationship Between Map Quality and Higher-Order Thinking in Kit-Build Concept Map. Human Interface and the Management of Information, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

    DOI10.1007/978-3-031-35129-7_27 (opens in a new tab)

Next articleCan Software Grade a Concept Map as Well as a Teacher(Keep scrolling)(Read it next)(Loading)