MGMLaboratory
Back

Menu

01Home
02About Us
03Projects
04Publications
05Member
06Articles
07Contact

Let's Talk

Open in Mail app

Socials

Malang (ID) --:--Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

November 22, 20212 min read

The bridge between two maps is where the learning showsThe bridge between two maps is where the learning shows

Counting the links that cross from an old concept map to a new one gives teachers a cheap and visible measure of integration.

  • Conference
  • Publications

Written by

  • SRShirasaka RenIT & Infrastructure · Student Member

In this article

  1. 01Why count the crossing links
  2. 02What a teacher can do with it

Most assessment asks what a student knows at the end. Extension concept mapping asks something slightly different: how well does the new material attach to what the student already had?

That question has a concrete answer in the form of extension relationships. An extension relationship is a proposition that crosses the boundary between the original map and the additional map. It is not a link inside either map. It is a link that exists only because the learner saw a connection between the two.

A concept map drawn by hand. Cross links are what extension mapping looks for. Image: Chabre, public domain.
Fig. 01A concept map drawn by hand. Cross links are what extension mapping looks for. Image: Chabre, public domain.

01/02

Why count the crossing links

The measure is attractive because it is cheap and visible. A teacher can scan a map and count how many propositions reach back to earlier material. In an ICCE 2021 study, that count separated two classes sharply: an average of 1.63 crossing links in one group against 5.32 in the other.

  • A high count suggests the learner is building one connected structure.
  • A low count suggests two islands of knowledge that never met.
  • Quality matters as well, which is why the study graded each crossing link for scientific correctness.

That quality dimension is worth pausing on. Ten wrong connections are worse than two right ones. Counting alone would miss the difference, so the study scored every extension relationship on a four level rubric rather than trusting the total.

Students in a computer lab. Extension mapping runs on any digital mapping tool. Photo: Michael Surran, CC BY-SA 2.0.
Fig. 02Students in a computer lab. Extension mapping runs on any digital mapping tool. Photo: Michael Surran, CC BY-SA 2.0.

02/02

What a teacher can do with it

The practical lesson is about how the second activity is framed. If students begin the extension phase from a blank canvas, they tend to build a separate map rather than a connected one. If they start from a structured base, whether teacher supplied or previously built, the crossing links appear more often.

It also suggests a change in how teachers read finished work. Instead of only checking whether the new concepts are present, check whether they connect back to the old ones. That single habit surfaces integration problems while there is still time to address them.

The study's own caution applies here too. The sample was small and the evidence is preliminary. But the idea costs nothing to try in a classroom, and the measure is one a teacher can read at a glance.

Source

  1. Prasetya, D.D., Pinandito, A., Hayashi, Y., et al. (2021). Investigating the Tightness of Connection between Original Map and Additional Map in Extension Concept Mapping. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2021).

Next articleHow tightly students connect a new concept map to an old one(Keep scrolling)(Read it next)(Loading)